Home Page | About Page | Photo Page | What's New Page | Favorite Links | Custom2 Page | Custom3 Page | Custom Page | Custom4 Page | Contact Us Page
SocialismKT

Welcome to SocialismKT!


Ever since my grandfather died with the request to be surrounded by trees of his forest at his death-bed and my uncle died with the perception to live every day as if it was the last one, I realised, Marx had not discovered all. You see, man is only a small part of nature, and you ought to enjoy life every minute, the way nature does, concentrate on what's a natural need, not a need of capitalists or a capitalist society; they cannot enjoy life, they only can consume products and entertainment. So, when you will have emancipated yourself from this neurotic world, from the necessity to work involuntarily, Karl Marx said, the realm of freedom, of voluntary action, will start: nature. Paul Lafargue, his son in law, said: If you have emancipated from this neurotic world, if you claim the right of doing nothing, of doing everything voluntarily, you can enter the realm of freedom now: nature. So Lafargue made emancipation feasible for everybody now, not for future generations, as Marx did. You know, there is not much difference between a tree-kangaroo and a man. A tree-kangaroo spends 60 % of a day sleeping, 20 % for looking around, and 20 % for reproduction. This applies to almost every day-living creature. And man is only a small part of nature.

Socialism starting in Germany

After the beginning of the last century, Chief Womba of Leverville, a place called after the founder of Unilever, the Dutch multinational company, collected coconuts for Mr. Lever. Mr. Lever was earning a lot of money, as you know. Chief Womba only had to deliver his coconuts for a good living. After a year, he had all he needed for a good living: ten wives, a big village, pearls, brass poles and so on. He no longer collected coconuts. Mr. Lever couldn't understand this attitude. "Why didn't Chief Womba carry on collecting coconuts? Every palm tree could be a full bank account for him."

Those who cannot stop collecting money, who regard striving for wealth as an end in itself, ought not be responsible for adults, children, partners of life, or the solidarity of a society, because striving for wealth destroys human relations. Fear is governing such people. They are behaving irrational, they are no longer in their senses because they need more than to satisfy their sensual needs. If this fear develops into expropriation, into subordinating men, at least two people are necessary: one who subordinates, and one who is subordinated. Chief Womba didn't belong to them. The insane Mr. Lever, however, found many other insane people on earth who readily complied with subordination.

Those who like Chief Womba do not need wealth and industrialisation as an end in itself, but only for the needs of a social being, do not feel at home in capitalism. Foolishly dropped into this world, they feel lonesome in this world of singles, relentless fighters, rogues, and traitors. Either they are aware of this, or they deny living in capitalism. Those denying take to past family structures as the conservatives do. Those aware of capitalism without being insane think of new social structures of solidarity to maintain their sanity among these insane surroundings. That's the dawn of socialism.

Thus it started in the last century. In the long run, however, the insane of the socialist movement carried the day. They didn't want to live up to their sensual needs only, but they were striving for bourgeois wealth and industrialisation as an end in itself. They thought, capitalism could go together with socialism, or, even worse, socialism had to compete with capitalism. They didn't think of capitalism and democracy as an antagonism. Or they thought of having to suffer this contradiction, no need to solve it, they thought themselves able to oppose nature, natural laws, natural development, natural dialectics. Looking for freedom in the sky, not on earth. Regarding the literature of Antoine de Saint Exupery e.g. as the price of industrialisation. Thus only testifying that capitalist antagonism can be suffered only by the assistance of priests, of culture.


Yet new generations were coming up again and again, sane people turned up again and again. So capitalism had to generate its material basis, i.e. insane people, again and again by violence, rape, war, stress, drugs. Most of the newborn wouldn't accept such insanity, so that the basis of capitalism was eroded more and more. This materialistic dialectics went on its way. The so called socialist movement, dominated by insane people, wasn't aware of this; turning Karl Marx into a priest, not relying in themselves as sensual and soical beings, they ended up in fighting each other. The new socialist movement wasn't satisfied with abolishing kingship, installing a parliamentary system. They didn't want representatives acting for them, they wanted real democracy, acting themselves, without the assistance of political parties or a state. They didn't need any assistance, they felt sane, able to govern themselves at every level: councils at every level. They said: Wealth and industrialisation is no end in itself, not to be reached at cost of solidarity. First priority is given to physical and psychic wellness of each. Self-sustaining and sharing, no commerce. Human relations are no commercial relations. You cannot buy somebody whom you can rely. Beyond self-sustaining you don't need much for your happiness, look at Chief Womba.

Meanwhile socialism, surrounded by capitalism, has grown among people, although they are not aware of it. More and more people defy consumerism, have mentally given notice to their boss, prefer their family to their career, are free to love more than one if needs be, are free to choose their neighbours, free to let students decide what, where, when, how and by whom they want to be taught. A new socialist movement is to bring this unconscious socialism into consciousness by offering three steps into socialism worldwide.

1. In German elections, a majority of people would vote for a government which guarantees a monthly income of 1250 Euro net. Which stops employment of individuals with a fortune of 250.000 Euro, and which stops employment of life-partners earning 50.000 Euro p.a. each. Which stops monthly incomes of more than 15.000 Euro gross. Which does away with German military forces, secret services, production of arms and subsidies for products produced cheaper by our European and non-European partners, thus taking seriously the rhetoric of partnership. Which taxes speculative investment yields and high earnings highly. Which confiscates real estate in case of evasive capital. Which no longer subsidises churches and political parties. Which reduces German parliament and government and abolishes the German status of a public servant. Which stops nuclear power and the Transrapid train. Which does not encourage the production and use of private cars. Which makes public radio an TV stations private. You see, there is enough revenue in Germany. If the Germans want it this way, it will be done this way. Then many Germans will be prepared to work for nothing. They will get rid of frustration and consumerism. Much of the revenue will be left to support the terms of trade of selected Third World partners. A stream of creative power will be released among people. The German government encourages them for self-government. It furthers collective, self-governed housing projects and keeps the housing and real estate market under control until there will be only co-operative societies in this market. The German government no longer interferes with education, just makes sure that children are offered some sort of education, free for the poor. It furthers free, self-governed school projects where the students decide by themselves what, where, when, how and by whom they want to be taught. Those who are born in Germany become German citizens, this applies also to foreigners who have lived in Germany for five years; immigrations quotas are set by law. Academics are put on a par with workers. Small and medium companies are furthered. The integration of the European Union is furthered by subsidising the poor members and the poor applicants.

2. The German society decides for a dynamic, mixed economy: Private companies which tend to become monopolies (let's say with a market share of 30 %) are transformed into co-operative societies. Co-operative societies which tend to become shell institutions are transformed into private companies. Since national competences are more and more shifted to the European Union, there is no longer any need for a national administration. People vote for a Free State Bavaria, Free State Saxonia, Katalonia, Breizah, Basque, Scotland, Wales etc. German parliaments are accompanied by Round Tables at every level: neighbourhood, quarter, town, district, region. At the lowest level, everybody can take part who lives there; every level delegates members to the next level. People express their political will by Round Tables; where it differs from the will of the respective parliament, this has to cope with it. The United Nations are transformed into a worldwide police organisation which has to interfere officially wherever people try to solve their problems by force.

3. Humanity is governed after the principle of self-sustaining and sharing. For example, all ships needed by humanity are produced only in Indonesia, Korea and at the Meyer shipyard at Papenburg. Other products, which are needed in these places, are produced in other regions of the earth.

Fascism in Germany

The current discussion on rightest activities in Germany has been going on since the end of World War II. Then, there was this common perception in Germany that you have to abolish capitalism if you want to get rid of fascism. Meanwhile this perception has been overruled by capitalist interests again. Nevertheless, the idea was right. Why?
The capitalist principle is: Each fighting each other. Or, misleading: Competition. So everybody concentrates on his or her interest, disregarding the rest of mankind. For reaching his or her goal, he or she refers to a majority of people who are silent as long as nobody interferes with their interests. He or she turns this silent majority even into active votes on his or her side when they are afraid of public disturbance; they don't want a squabble about a regardless single, they want to be left in "peace" as long as nobody interferes with their interests. So the capitalist principle actually favours egotistic, irrational issues come into practice. That's what we call fascism.
Besides, the capitalist principle only applies to unequal "partners": David in "competition" with Goliath. Developed countries do not open up their markets to least developed countries completely. First-class industrialised countries do not open up their markets to second-class industrialised countries completely. They open up only as far as the others do not endanger their superiority. That's what they call competition.




Where fascism/xenophobia comes from

The lifestyle of capitalism is "each fighting each other". Everybody sees only to his/her own interest. As long as nobody minds his/her business, he/she doesn't care what's going on around. Mildly giving his/her consent to whatever is wanted, as long as he/she can pursue his/her interest. Thus any dictator prospers on a silent majority. And if there are any troublemakers, he can utilise the silent majority, because the people of the silent majority don't want to be disturbed in their business.

So you have to abolish capitalism if you want to get rid of fascism.




How does he live: a socialist in the centre of capitalism?

Well, I have a list of priorities:
1. Satisfaction of sensual needs.
2. Physical relaxation.
3. Social commitment to next to kin, not by blood, but by feeling: feeling disgusted of capitalist ideology. Commitment without expecting anything in return.
4. Part-time scientist if some problems come up. You know, everybody ought to be encouraged to be able to be a scientist in every field and to ask scientists until they answer understandably, if needs be.
5. Part-time politician to put the solutions of these studies into practice. Everybody ought to be able to be a politician.
6. Enjoying letters and the arts for a while so that I can bear unsolved problems.
7. Defending and expanding my way of life.
8. Deliberately underperforming.

Sure, it's not natural to stand alone as a social being. But as it is, capitalism, each fighting each other, you are separated. So you have to be able to stand alone if you want to keep sane. Defending your space from your standpoint. Creating new space with free access to those you choose. You better choose those who also can stand alone. Or you wait until the others have grown to your state. For, principally, everybody can associate with everybody; you only have to wait long enough. So it's most important that people don't let themselves shove around the earth, but stay where they are in order to see what's growing, stay at home, in the end. What all of you have in common, will create a common space viable also for the wounded. Defend your common space, defend the commons, as long as you are surrounded by capitalism.



The capitalist society: an irrational society




- They go on eating British beef, although the origins of BSE and the chain to the Creutzfeld Jakob disease have not yet been completely studied.
- They go on using mobiles although there are still some scientific doubts about the use of mobiles causing tumours.
- They go on using nuclear energy of plants which hadn't got a licence if they were normal factories: no reference of safe waste deposits, no insurance covering possible damage.
- They go on smoking although their health is damaged thereby.


In the long run, in the historical run

people cannot be separated by walls, dissociated by enemies' infiltration, people cannot close up to the rest of the world, people can forestall invasion by making friends with the foreigners, people can evade insanity by behaving sensible.


Topics

Gerhard Schröder is still to learn about capitalism: If he wants to catch up with the US economic performance, he will have to limit social benefit for some years and he will have to destroy trade unions. He is well on his way, though.

In the development of both capitalism and communism as we can visualise them in the next fifty or hundred years, the process of automatisation and alienation will proceed. Both systems are developing into managerial societies, their inhabitants well fed, well clad, having their wishes satisfied; automatons, who follow without force, who are guided without leaders, who make machines which act like men and produce men who act like machines; men, whose reason deteriorates while their intelligence rises, thus creating the dangerous situation of equipping man with the greatest material power without the wisdom to use it. (Erich Fromm, 1955)

Centralisation and mass production lead up to BSE. Globalisation (Britain importing beef from Australia and South America) leads up to the foot and mouth disease. Hit-lists don't pay off in the long run. People prefer evergreens private radio-stations say. Socialism is: no numbers, decentralisation, regional supply.

Suddenly last summer ...

Contergan disabled children were born.

People could no longer move free under the sun.

The weapons turned back on their soldiers.

The USSR imploded.

The underdogs played a part at Seattle and elsewhere.

People no longer enjoyed their food because of BSE and dioxine.






You want to send me an email?

The Bridge to the 21st Century
I think bridges are cool, don't you?

Karl-Heinz and the bridge to the 21st century






Look at him from a different site.


By me, various people get various answers to the same question.


I wonder what you think of this page.